When historical villains die, at least if they are white, male Americans, Conventional Wisdom and Miss Manners say one should simply move on neutrally, "not speaking ill of the dead." Or something.
I strongly disagree. Whereas I philosophically agree that there is no such thing as a totally evil person without contradictions, it is quite appropriate to draw a balance sheet on public figures who have greatly and directly impacted our lives ... in this case for ill.
Helms was such a voluble and prolific person, Rush-Limbaugh-cum-Senator-Claghorn, and his ascendance so felicitously intersected the rightward moving Zeitgeist, that his legacy of harm extends far and wide – from making overt racism politically acceptable in modernized ways, to eliminating civil liberties and the right to organize as workers, to restricting women's reproductive freedom domestically and around the world, to banning public support for art with any erotic or sexual content, to extending the HIV epidemic by forbidding any federal funds to be used on any materials that frankly portray and discuss sex and drug use.
It is the latter atrocity for which he is eponymously known in what remains of the "AIDS Movement," the so-called "Helms Amendment" also known as the "No Promo Homo" act. When I was googling to check the details of my memory, I discovered that "Helms Amendment" is a plural not a singular term, a metastatic cancer on the body politic. There were literally dozens of Helms Amendments! Many of them fortunately did not pass, but enough of them did to leave a crippling legacy across health, art and international relations. They seemed to have one theme in common: they were all aimed against women, gays and lesbians, and/or sex, period.
Some of these amendments were fought at the time, whereas many, including the one on HIV prevention, were shamelessly supported by the vast majority of Democrats as well as Republicans. The "Anti-HIV-Prevention Helms Amendment" passed the Senate 98-2 and the House of Representatives 358-47 in the fall of 1987. It said: [federal] funding cannot be used for AIDS education and other programs "designed to promote or encourage, directly or indirectly, intravenous drug abuse or sexual activity, homosexual or heterosexual." We tend to think of it as just prohibiting the positive mention of gay sex, and that is the way it has most often been enforced. But in fact, he hated sex of any sort. Never mind that the prevention brochure that offended him (a GMHC pamphlet) was carefully produced with non-public funds. Indeed, the amendment, while ostensibly applying only to federal funds, was swiftly generalized de jure or de facto to prohibit any agency receiving any federal funds from doing sexually explicit education of any kind with anyone's money.
The CDC, most local and state health departments, and increasingly most ASOs/CBOs have accepted this Helms Amendment as written in stone for the ages, have accommodated to it, and have been therefore complicit in effectively damaging HIV prevention every year, every moment ever since.
It's time for that to end. Now. No excuses, no exceptions. Delete the HIV Helms Amendment (and all the rest of them). Now. No compromise indicated or necessary. No ass kissing or tiptoeing around for fear of offending lesser-evil Democrats or African-AIDS-treatment-supporting Republicans. No rationalizations. Simple motions (why not put it on a must-pass appropriations bill like the original enactment was?).
Remove the Helms Amendment(s). Now. End AIDS.
Jesse Helms: Dead At Last! Act to Bury His Odious Legacy With Him
Fri, 07/04/2008 - 4:31pm - Walt Senterfitt

I have spent much of the
Fighting for Human Rights
Fighting for Human Rights When We Don't Know Our Own History
I spent the morning with a young friend (well, not that young) who knew little to nothing about the lethal legacy that Helms leaves after his long career of racism, homophobia, sexism, and hatred. For people who want a reminder of the Republican Party and AIDS during one of the many periods that Helms had enormous influence (1988), take a look at http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4hG_iuU9wSE. And for people who can't imagine the level of hatred in those days, this is a nasty, accurate reminder
The tactics and language have changed over the years, but has the hatred really dissipated? It’s still very much present, perhaps less so and couched in different terms. I receive far less hate mail now than I used to. Does that mean that the hatred really is slowly disappearing? Are we getting closer to achieving what we must? I honestly don't know.
To watch another reminder of Helms' influence - but this is a joyous one - go to http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bngtgTwvKcE and see a still inspiring example of direct action by the Treatment Action Guerillas.
James
I agree with Walt– we
Post new comment